Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGMX
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGMX
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGMX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WHGMX (113M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: FTHFX (0.57) vs WHGMX (0.36). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WHGMX (21 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGMX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.81 vs. WHGMX (16.83). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.82 vs. WHGMX (24.01).
| FTHFX | WHGMX | FTHFX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.958 | 16.891 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 113M | 10,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.36 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.81 | 16.83 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.42 | 44.13 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.82 | 24.01 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 246.73 | 41.12 | 600% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement