Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGMX
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGMX
FTHFX vs WHGMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGMX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WHGMX (108M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WHGMX: FTHFX (0.56) vs WHGMX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGMX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WHGMX (21 years). WHGMX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WHGMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGMX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGMX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.73 vs. WHGMX (8.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.86 vs. WHGMX (16.37).
| FTHFX | WHGMX | FTHFX / WHGMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.85 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.570 | 12.424 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 108M | 11,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.37 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.73 | 8.34 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.23 | 34.37 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.86 | 16.37 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 227.79 | 28.92 | 788% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement