Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGSX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WHGSX (875M). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WHGSX (0.65) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGSX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.29 vs. WHGSX (9.47). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.47 vs. WHGSX (10.21).
| FTHFX | WHGSX | FTHFX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.92 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.06 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.111 | 15.340 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 875M | 1,383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.65 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.29 | 9.47 | 288% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.50 | 12.37 | 441% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.47 | 10.21 | 641% |
| Returns for 10 years | 244.71 | 69.77 | 351% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers