Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WHGSX
FTHFX vs WHGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WHGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WHGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WHGSX (773M). WHGSX pays higher dividends than FTHFX: WHGSX (0.67) vs FTHFX (0.56). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WHGSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WHGSX (19 years). WHGSX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WHGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 63.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WHGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WHGSX (100000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. WHGSX (-0.60). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. WHGSX (6.89).
| FTHFX | WHGSX | FTHFX / WHGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.92 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.06 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 10.209 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 773M | 1,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.67 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | -0.60 | -2,561% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | 13.91 | 422% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | 6.89 | 884% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | 58.38 | 406% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers