Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.91B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.91B vs. WMCVX (1.49B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WMCVX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.78 vs. WMCVX (-14.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.55 vs. WMCVX (38.48).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.721 | -7.903 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.91B | 1.49B | 664% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,211% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.78 | -14.92 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.46 | 12.01 | 329% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.55 | 38.48 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.30 | 39.96 | 331% |