Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$46.17
Change+$0.28 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Wasatch Small Cap Value
Price$9.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. WMCVX (1.6B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.95) vs WMCVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (13 years) vs WMCVX (27 years). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. WMCVX (-2.50). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.44 vs. WMCVX (22.86).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.033 | -2.973 | -338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 1.6B | 644% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | -2.50 | -403% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.92 | -1.82 | -1,477% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.44 | 22.86 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.45 | 67.77 | 157% |