Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$52.18
Change-$0.55 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Wasatch Small Cap Value
Price$12.31
Change-$0.09 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMCVX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WMCVX (1.76B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.95) vs WMCVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (13 years) vs WMCVX (27 years). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (35.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.40 vs. WMCVX (33.33). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 103.89 vs. WMCVX (58.22).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.667 | 21.094 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.76B | 635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.40 | 33.33 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 4.77 | 762% |
| Returns for 5 years | 103.89 | 58.22 | 178% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.49 | 107.30 | 113% |