Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WMCVX (1.49B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WMCVX (0.07). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (27 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.27 vs. WMCVX (-16.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.03 vs. WMCVX (45.31).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.906 | -8.511 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 1.49B | 670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.07 | 1,199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | -16.34 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 6.80 | 544% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.03 | 45.31 | 223% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.62 | 41.86 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers