Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$39.57
Change-$1.45 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.41B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.41B vs. WMCVX (1.43B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WMCVX (0.07). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (27 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.51 vs. WMCVX (-18.02). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 92.14 vs. WMCVX (54.28).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.687 | -13.171 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.41B | 1.43B | 659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.07 | 1,240% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.51 | -18.02 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.93 | -5.77 | -415% |
| Returns for 5 years | 92.14 | 54.28 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.25 | 33.79 | 240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...