Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$47.33
Change+$0.43 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.59B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. WMCVX (1.56B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.74) vs WMCVX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. WMCVX (-11.21). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 86.99 vs. WMCVX (30.45).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.258 | -3.343 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 1.56B | 678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.06 | 1,189% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.93 | -11.21 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.13 | 6.65 | 573% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.99 | 30.45 | 286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.26 | 49.63 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement