Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change-$0.51 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.17B
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WMCVX (1.61B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WMCVX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMCVX (28 years). WMCVX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.35 vs. WMCVX (-13.99). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 99.10 vs. WMCVX (33.10).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.18 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.964 | 0.507 | 2,164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.61B | 697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.06 | 1,151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.35 | -13.99 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.30 | 29.24 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 99.10 | 33.10 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.12 | 63.49 | 274% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement