Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WMCVX (1.31B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.57) vs WMCVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMCVX (29 years). WMCVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.84 vs. WMCVX (2.35). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.40 vs. WMCVX (-7.04).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 11.942 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 1.31B | 921% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.84 | 2.35 | 1,016% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.60 | 4.76 | 1,106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.40 | -7.04 | -928% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 61.08 | 378% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement