Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMCVX
FTHFX vs WMCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMCVX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WMCVX (1.38B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMCVX: FTHFX (0.59) vs WMCVX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMCVX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMCVX (29 years). WMCVX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WMCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMCVX (2000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.43 vs. WMCVX (7.87). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 57.59 vs. WMCVX (-11.42).
| FTHFX | WMCVX | FTHFX / WMCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.17 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.752 | 11.607 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 1.38B | 811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.43 | 7.87 | 386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.04 | 11.55 | 511% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.59 | -11.42 | -504% |
| Returns for 10 years | 249.97 | 70.38 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers