Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMKSX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMKSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WMKSX (178M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: FTHFX (0.57) vs WMKSX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMKSX (33 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMKSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMKSX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. WMKSX (6.59). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. WMKSX (-3.48).
| FTHFX | WMKSX | FTHFX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 20.753 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 178M | 6,798% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 6.59 | 388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 39.36 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -3.48 | -1,885% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | 40.26 | 574% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement