Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMKSX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WMKSX (176M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: FTHFX (0.56) vs WMKSX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMKSX (33 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMKSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMKSX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.72 vs. WMKSX (4.10). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. WMKSX (-5.52).
| FTHFX | WMKSX | FTHFX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 20.068 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 176M | 6,875% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 4.10 | 603% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 37.48 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | -5.52 | -1,218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 35.19 | 687% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement