Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMKSX
FTHFX vs WMKSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMKSX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a StrongBuy and WMKSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. WMKSX (172M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMKSX: FTHFX (0.59) vs WMKSX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMKSX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMKSX (32 years). WMKSX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WMKSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WMKSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMKSX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.17 vs. WMKSX (8.18). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.70 vs. WMKSX (-9.66).
| FTHFX | WMKSX | FTHFX / WMKSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.33 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.196 | 15.000 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 172M | 6,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.17 | 8.18 | 344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.44 | 39.18 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.70 | -9.66 | -567% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.03 | 37.04 | 645% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers