Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.91
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.01B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.25M
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10B vs. WMMAX (192M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WMMAX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMAX (24 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.27 vs. WMMAX (-20.92). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 101.03 vs. WMMAX (-23.39).
| FTHFX | WMMAX | FTHFX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.906 | -3.559 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10B | 192M | 5,208% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.01 | 5,935% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.27 | -20.92 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | -32.22 | -115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.03 | -23.39 | -432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 131.62 | -38.47 | -342% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers