Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.20
Change+$0.63 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.82B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.87M
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.82B vs. WMMAX (194M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WMMAX (0.01). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). WMMAX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.00 vs. WMMAX (-23.64). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 134.22 vs. WMMAX (-11.26).
| FTHFX | WMMAX | FTHFX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.50 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.275 | -6.313 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.82B | 194M | 5,060% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.01 | 6,084% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.00 | -23.64 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.74 | -41.19 | -58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.22 | -11.26 | -1,192% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.21 | -41.37 | -218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...