Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMAX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$44.65
Change-$1.01 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.13B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites A
Price$14.88
Change-$0.29 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.02M
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. WMMAX (214M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FTHFX (0.95) vs WMMAX (0.29). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FTHFX (13 years) vs WMMAX (23 years). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.86 vs. WMMAX (-15.49). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.97 vs. WMMAX (-40.12).
| FTHFX | WMMAX | FTHFX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.695 | -0.067 | 2,524% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 214M | 4,720% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.95 | 0.29 | 328% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.86 | -15.49 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.39 | -35.77 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.97 | -40.12 | -174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.29 | -35.67 | -267% |