Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WMMAX (206M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FTHFX (0.57) vs WMMAX (0.37). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.56 vs. WMMAX (7.98). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 65.58 vs. WMMAX (-41.02).
| FTHFX | WMMAX | FTHFX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.53 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.53 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 26.508 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 206M | 5,874% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.37 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.56 | 7.98 | 321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | -17.17 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.58 | -41.02 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.04 | -26.95 | -857% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement