Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WMMAX
FTHFX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WMMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WMMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WMMAX (198M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FTHFX (0.56) vs WMMAX (0.39). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). WMMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WMMAX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.30 vs. WMMAX (0.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. WMMAX (-40.88).
| FTHFX | WMMAX | FTHFX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.53 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.53 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.839 | 23.976 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 198M | 6,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.39 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 0.72 | 2,128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.68 | -15.73 | -373% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.92 | -40.88 | -149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 237.29 | -27.58 | -860% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers