Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$40.34
Change+$0.27 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.13B
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity C
Price$13.91
Change+$0.09 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.02M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.14B vs. WWSCX (60M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs WWSCX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (23 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. WWSCX (-24.36). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 93.37 vs. WWSCX (34.90).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.779 | -18.370 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.14B | 60M | 15,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.06 | 1,468% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -24.36 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.87 | -27.13 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 93.37 | 34.90 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.84 | -25.20 | -305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...