Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.89
Change+$0.42 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.08B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.21
Change+$0.33 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.12M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. WWSCX (69.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.69) vs WWSCX (0.05). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.91 vs. WWSCX (-14.20). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 94.83 vs. WWSCX (35.41).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 5.611 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 69.1M | 16,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.05 | 1,435% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.91 | -14.20 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.30 | 7.18 | 701% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.83 | 35.41 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.48 | 3.53 | 4,805% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement