Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$48.37
Change-$0.38 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.99B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$17.13
Change-$0.15 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.08M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. WWSCX (68.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs WWSCX (0.05). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. WWSCX (-13.43). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 90.62 vs. WWSCX (33.07).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.332 | 2.067 | 355% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 68.1M | 16,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.05 | 1,410% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | -13.43 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.30 | -7.52 | -509% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.62 | 33.07 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 156.42 | -2.97 | -5,266% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement