Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.57
Change-$0.39 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.28B
Keeley Small Cap Fund C
Price$18.03
Change-$0.15 (-0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.57M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. WWSCX (70.6M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs WWSCX (0.05). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.10 vs. WWSCX (-9.01). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 113.38 vs. WWSCX (55.65).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.996 | 7.383 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 70.6M | 16,006% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.05 | 1,429% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.10 | -9.01 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.07 | 15.97 | 401% |
| Returns for 5 years | 113.38 | 55.65 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 188.90 | 11.51 | 1,642% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement