Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.73
Change-$0.69 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.11B
TETON Westwood SmallCap Equity C
Price$15.55
Change-$0.32 (-2.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.66M
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 10.1B vs. WWSCX (65.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.79) vs WWSCX (0.06). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs WWSCX (24 years). WWSCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). FTHFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. WWSCX (21.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.23 vs. WWSCX (-15.86). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 96.61 vs. WWSCX (35.87).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.202 | -6.261 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 65.7M | 15,373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.06 | 1,420% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | -15.86 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.67 | -6.88 | -606% |
| Returns for 5 years | 96.61 | 35.87 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.97 | -15.52 | -876% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement