Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs WWSCX
FTHFX vs WWSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. WWSCX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and WWSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. WWSCX (153M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than WWSCX: FTHFX (0.57) vs WWSCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than WWSCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs WWSCX (25 years). WWSCX (2.41) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). WWSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). WWSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: WWSCX (1000) vs FTHFX (1000000). WWSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.77 vs. FTHFX (24.29). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 63.44 vs. WWSCX (19.04).
| FTHFX | WWSCX | FTHFX / WWSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.00 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 2.41 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.175 | 30.648 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 153M | 7,908% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.29 | 42.77 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.11 | 33.72 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.44 | 19.04 | 333% |
| Returns for 10 years | 232.28 | 57.30 | 405% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement