Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$50.04
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.31B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. ZSCCX (30.1M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.70) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.94 vs. ZSCCX (-9.13). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 105.84 vs. ZSCCX (51.76).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.436 | 7.544 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 30.1M | 37,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | -9.13 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.57 | 14.22 | 398% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.84 | 51.76 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 178.76 | 42.91 | 417% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement