Ad is loading...
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$43.24
Change+$1.01 (+2.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.57B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 9.57B vs. ZSCCX (26.7M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.82) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.53 vs. ZSCCX (-17.44). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.07 vs. ZSCCX (52.31).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.023 | -9.536 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.57B | 26.7M | 35,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -17.44 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.12 | -8.62 | -326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.07 | 52.31 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.14 | 17.73 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers