Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq R6
Price$49.42
Change-$0.23 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.24B
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Buy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. ZSCCX (29.9M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.74) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.63). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FTHFX (41.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). FTHFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. ZSCCX (-12.78). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 98.25 vs. ZSCCX (45.91).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.39 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.71 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.313 | 5.911 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 29.9M | 37,458% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | -12.78 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.36 | 5.50 | 862% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.25 | 45.91 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 175.07 | 40.62 | 431% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement