Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FTHFX vs ZSCCX
FTHFX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTHFX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHFX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. ZSCCX (36.3M). FTHFX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FTHFX (0.56) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FTHFX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FTHFX (15 years) vs ZSCCX (15 years). ZSCCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). ZSCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: ZSCCX (2500) vs FTHFX (1000000). ZSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.04 vs. FTHFX (24.72). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.28 vs. ZSCCX (33.17).
| FTHFX | ZSCCX | FTHFX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.40 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.76 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.613 | 25.148 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 36.3M | 33,333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 34.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.64 | 29.84 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.28 | 33.17 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 241.65 | 74.48 | 324% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement