Advertisement
FTHI vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTHI is a Hold and SEIC is a StrongBuy.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FTHI | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WDIV | 73.03 | 0.05 | +0.07% |
| SPDR® S&P Global Dividend ETF | |||
| CHFJPY | 183.64 | -0.02 | -0.01% |
| Switzerland Franc - Japan Yen | |||
| AUDJPY | 96.16 | -0.03 | -0.03% |
| Australian Dollar - Japan Yen | |||
| GBPJPY | 198.27 | -0.30 | -0.15% |
| United Kingdom Pound - Japan Yen | |||
| FSEP | 49.63 | -0.22 | -0.43% |
| FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Sep | |||
FTHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHI has been closely correlated with ARES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTHI jumps, then ARES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHI | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| ARES - FTHI | 80% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| AXP - FTHI | 79% Closely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| GS - FTHI | 79% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SEIC - FTHI | 79% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| MS - FTHI | 78% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 78% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 74% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| KKR - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||