Ad is loading...
FTI
Price
$30.02
Change
+$1.02 (+3.52%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
89 days until earnings call
HAL
Price
$31.87
Change
+$0.69 (+2.21%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FTI vs HAL

Header iconFTI vs HAL Comparison
Open Charts FTI vs HALBanner chart's image
TechnipFMC
Price$30.02
Change+$1.02 (+3.52%)
Volume$3.35M
CapitalizationN/A
Halliburton
Price$31.87
Change+$0.69 (+2.21%)
Volume$11.48M
CapitalizationN/A
FTI vs HAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTI vs. HAL commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTI is a Buy and HAL is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (FTI: $30.02 vs. HAL: $31.87)
Brand notoriety: FTI: Not notable vs. HAL: Notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTI: 90% vs. HAL: 113%
Market capitalization -- FTI: $10.98B vs. HAL: $35.54B
FTI [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $10.98B. HAL’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $35.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FTI and HAL are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTI’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTI is a better buy in the short-term than HAL.

Price Growth

FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.56% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTI is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

HAL is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.33% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAL($35.5B) has a higher market cap than FTI($11B). FTI has higher P/E ratio than HAL: FTI (212.42) vs HAL (13.67). FTI YTD gains are higher at: 50.185 vs. HAL (-10.455). HAL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. FTI (707M). HAL has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. FTI (962M). FTI has less debt than HAL: FTI (1.97B) vs HAL (8.81B). HAL has higher revenues than FTI: HAL (23B) vs FTI (7.82B).
FTIHALFTI / HAL
Capitalization11B35.5B31%
EBITDA707M4.94B14%
Gain YTD50.185-10.455-480%
P/E Ratio212.4213.671,553%
Revenue7.82B23B34%
Total Cash962M2.26B42%
Total Debt1.97B8.81B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTI vs HAL: Fundamental Ratings
FTI
HAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2017
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3044
SMR RATING
1..100
4437
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10079
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAL's Valuation (38) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (62) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (44) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's SMR Rating (37) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (44) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (55) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.

HAL's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (100) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTIHAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMOM60.590.70
+1.17%
JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF
IWD196.112.19
+1.13%
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
IPKW41.200.12
+0.29%
Invesco Intl BuyBack Achiev™ ETF
ESGB21.03-0.01
-0.05%
NYLI MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF
UFIV48.10-0.04
-0.08%
US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF

FTI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been closely correlated with OII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then OII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTI
1D Price
Change %
FTI100%
+3.52%
OII - FTI
77%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
WFRD - FTI
68%
Closely correlated
+3.51%
HAL - FTI
67%
Closely correlated
+2.21%
NOV - FTI
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
SLB - FTI
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More

HAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with LBRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then LBRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAL
1D Price
Change %
HAL100%
+2.21%
LBRT - HAL
77%
Closely correlated
+4.44%
SLB - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
WHD - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
+4.84%
OII - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
NOV - HAL
75%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
More