Advertisement
FTI vs HAL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTI is a StrongBuy and HAL is a Hold.
| FTI | HAL | FTI / HAL | |
| Capitalization | 29.9B | 29.9B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | 3.59B | 55% |
| Gain YTD | 71.679 | 28.573 | 251% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.69 | 18.76 | 142% |
| Revenue | 10.4B | 22.4B | 46% |
| Total Cash | 992M | 2.05B | 48% |
| Total Debt | 1.24B | 8.2B | 15% |
FTI | HAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAL's Valuation (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTI (63) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTI’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (55) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (57) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (43) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (16) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.
| FTI | HAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while HAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FTI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HAL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -3.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+0.17% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
Advertisement
FTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been loosely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
HAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAL has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAL jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAL | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| NOV - HAL | 71% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| SLB - HAL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BKR - HAL | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| WFRD - HAL | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| XPRO - HAL | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||