Advertisement
FTI vs HAL
Which Stock Would AI Choose? TechnipFMC (FTI) vs. Halliburton (HAL) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FTI has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance at approximately +58% compared to HAL's +30%, driven by robust subsea orders.
- Both stocks recently beat earnings expectations, with FTI reporting a subsea backlog surge and HAL securing key contracts like electric fracturing in Argentina.
- FTI trades at a higher trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings) of 30.6 versus HAL's 24.5, reflecting premium growth expectations.
- FTI boasts higher return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholders' equity) at 29.6% compared to HAL's 12.3%.
- Market caps are similar around $28-30 billion, but FTI shows greater momentum in recent oilfield services trends.
Introduction
TechnipFMC (FTI) and Halliburton (HAL) are leading players in the oilfield services and subsea technology sectors, both benefiting from sustained energy demand amid volatile oil prices. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and growth drivers, offering insights for energy sector investors and traders navigating current market conditions. With global offshore projects expanding and drilling activity steady, understanding relative strengths in backlog, profitability, and momentum helps inform positioning in this cyclical industry.
FTI Overview and Recent Performance
TechnipFMC plc (FTI) provides subsea and surface technologies for the energy industry, focusing on offshore production systems and integrated project delivery. In recent market activity, FTI shares have shown strong upward momentum, with YTD gains near 58% and trading around $70, close to its 52-week high of $75.52. Key influences include a Q4 FY25 earnings beat, with EPS of $0.70 surpassing estimates, and a subsea backlog expansion to over $10 billion annually, signaling robust order intake amid rising offshore investments. Analyst upgrades, such as Goldman Sachs raising its target to $75, have supported sentiment, though recent pullbacks reflect broader sector volatility.
HAL Overview and Recent Performance
Halliburton Company (HAL) delivers comprehensive oilfield services, including drilling, completion, and production optimization across onshore and offshore operations. Recent weeks have seen HAL maintain steady performance, up about 30% YTD and trading near $37, within its 52-week range of $19-41. Q1 2026 results exceeded forecasts, with EPS at $0.55 versus $0.50 expected and revenue of $5.4 billion, bolstered by contracts like electric fracturing with YPF in Argentina. Positive analyst revisions, including Citigroup's target hike to $45, underscore confidence in international growth, despite pressures from North American market softness.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These curated bots, selected for current market suitability, feature diverse strategies like swing trading industrials or semiconductor plays, with annualized returns ranging from +30% to +121%, win rates of 55-87%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Timeframes vary from 5 minutes to days, emphasizing risk-adjusted metrics such as profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10 in leaders. Traders can copy signals in real-time with customizable risk management. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with energy sector trends or broader portfolios.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FTI emphasizes subsea systems and project execution, contrasting HAL's broader services spanning drilling fluids to completion tools, exposing HAL to more onshore volatility. Growth drivers favor FTI's offshore backlog surge versus HAL's international contracts, contributing to FTI's superior 12-month returns (over 100% in some metrics vs. HAL's 30-40%). Risk factors include oil price sensitivity for both, but HAL's higher debt-to-equity (79% vs. 39%) adds leverage risk. Sector exposure tilts FTI toward deepwater projects, while HAL balances global basins; sentiment leans positive for FTI on higher ROE and margins (9.7% vs. 5.8%).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward FTI over HAL, citing consistent trend strength, elevated backlog visibility, and superior profitability metrics like ROE exceeding 25%. HAL offers stability via dividends (1.85% yield) and earnings reliability, but FTI's relative momentum and growth positioning suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term amid offshore energy tailwinds.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTI is a Buy and HAL is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTI’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FTI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а -1.63% price change this week, while HAL (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -7.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTI is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
HAL is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oilfield Services/Equipment (-3.11% weekly)The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
| FTI | HAL | FTI / HAL | |
| Capitalization | 26.9B | 29.4B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 1.91B | 3.53B | 54% |
| Gain YTD | 51.456 | 25.586 | 201% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.82 | 19.43 | 133% |
| Revenue | 10.2B | 22.2B | 46% |
| Total Cash | 961M | 2B | 48% |
| Total Debt | 1.3B | 8.08B | 16% |
FTI | HAL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 30 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HAL's Valuation (28) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (58) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAL (62) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAL’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (59) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
FTI's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HAL (52) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to HAL’s over the last 12 months.
HAL's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (24) in the null industry. This means that HAL’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.
| FTI | HAL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
FTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been loosely correlated with TTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then TTI could also see price increases.