FTI
Price
$25.54
Change
+$0.55 (+2.20%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.98B
5 days until earnings call
NOA
Price
$15.35
Change
+$0.20 (+1.32%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
604.62M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FTI vs NOA

Header iconFTI vs NOA Comparison
Open Charts FTI vs NOABanner chart's image
TechnipFMC
Price$25.54
Change+$0.55 (+2.20%)
Volume$3.38M
Capitalization10.98B
North American Construction Group
Price$15.35
Change+$0.20 (+1.32%)
Volume$85.92K
Capitalization604.62M
FTI vs NOA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTI vs. NOA commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTI is a Hold and NOA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FTI: $25.54 vs. NOA: $15.35)
Brand notoriety: FTI and NOA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTI: 62% vs. NOA: 87%
Market capitalization -- FTI: $10.98B vs. NOA: $604.62M
FTI [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $10.98B. NOA’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $604.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FTI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the long-term than FTI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NOA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOA is a better buy in the short-term than FTI.

Price Growth

FTI (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while NOA (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +11.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +3.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTI is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

NOA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+3.92% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTI($11B) has a higher market cap than NOA($605M). FTI has higher P/E ratio than NOA: FTI (212.42) vs NOA (14.57). FTI YTD gains are higher at: -11.592 vs. NOA (-28.968). FTI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 707M vs. NOA (253M). FTI has more cash in the bank: 962M vs. NOA (88.6M). NOA has less debt than FTI: NOA (717M) vs FTI (1.97B). FTI has higher revenues than NOA: FTI (7.82B) vs NOA (957M).
FTINOAFTI / NOA
Capitalization11B605M1,818%
EBITDA707M253M279%
Gain YTD-11.592-28.96840%
P/E Ratio212.4214.571,458%
Revenue7.82B957M818%
Total Cash962M88.6M1,086%
Total Debt1.97B717M275%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTI vs NOA: Fundamental Ratings
FTI
NOA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
829
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1442
SMR RATING
1..100
3754
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7579
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NOA's Valuation (46) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as FTI (70) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew similarly to FTI’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (42) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (54) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

FTI's Price Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as NOA (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that FTI’s stock grew similarly to NOA’s over the last 12 months.

NOA's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTI (100) in the null industry. This means that NOA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTINOA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FTI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEMGX9.300.11
+1.20%
Voya Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Eq I
LMASX30.100.34
+1.14%
ClearBridge Small Cap C
MAIFX9.100.10
+1.11%
MoA International Fund
DHLYX30.520.29
+0.96%
Diamond Hill Large Cap Y
LCFLX12.230.08
+0.66%
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C

FTI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTI has been closely correlated with BKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTI jumps, then BKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTI
1D Price
Change %
FTI100%
+2.20%
BKR - FTI
80%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
OII - FTI
80%
Closely correlated
+3.65%
HAL - FTI
77%
Closely correlated
+5.13%
CHX - FTI
76%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
SLB - FTI
76%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
More

NOA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOA has been loosely correlated with VAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOA jumps, then VAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOA
1D Price
Change %
NOA100%
+1.32%
VAL - NOA
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.95%
HAL - NOA
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.13%
FTI - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
WFRD - NOA
56%
Loosely correlated
+5.41%
OII - NOA
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.65%
More