Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTINX vs HBLCX
FTINX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTINX vs HBLCX
FTINX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTINX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTINX is a Buy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. FTINX (2.27B). FTINX pays higher dividends than HBLCX: FTINX (2.70) vs HBLCX (2.49). FTINX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTINX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FTINX (0.55). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTINX (24.00). FTINX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTINX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTINX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTINX (500). FTINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.38 vs. HBLCX (5.80). FTINX return over 5 years is better than : 20.94 vs. HBLCX (1.37).
| FTINX | HBLCX | FTINX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.65 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.65 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.708 | 3.107 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 11.2B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 2.49 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.38 | 5.80 | 248% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.34 | 17.53 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.94 | 1.37 | 1,533% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.15 | 31.32 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement