Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTINX vs HBLSX
FTINX vs HBLSX Comparison
Open Charts FTINX vs HBLSX
FTINX vs HBLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTINX vs. HBLSX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTINX is a StrongBuy and HBLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FTINX (2.21B). HBLSX pays higher dividends than FTINX: HBLSX (3.02) vs FTINX (2.71). FTINX was incepted earlier than HBLSX: FTINX (19 years) vs HBLSX (16 years). HBLSX (0.96) is less costly to investors than FTINX (0.55). HBLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTINX (24.00). FTINX (0) and HBLSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.91 vs. HBLSX (3.96). FTINX return over 5 years is better than : 17.64 vs. HBLSX (5.00).
| FTINX | HBLSX | FTINX / HBLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.96 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.96 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.992 | 5.721 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 11.1B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.91 | 3.96 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.05 | 21.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.64 | 5.00 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.52 | 37.67 | 142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement