Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTIWX vs RBBCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% I
Price$14.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.61B
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.92M
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTIWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTIWX is a Hold and RBBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTIWX has more cash in the bank: 5.61B vs. RBBCX (842M). FTIWX (3.07) and RBBCX (3.07) have matching dividends . FTIWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTIWX (19 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FTIWX (0.52). FTIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. RBBCX (18.00). FTIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTIWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTIWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTIWX (500). RBBCX (7.60) and FTIWX (7.52) have marching annual gain over last year. FTIWX return over 5 years is better than : 13.39 vs. RBBCX (9.90).
| FTIWX | RBBCX | FTIWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.72 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.033 | 8.533 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 5.61B | 842M | 667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.07 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.52 | 7.60 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.49 | 22.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | 9.90 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.37 | 40.99 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers