Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTIWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTIWX is a Hold and RBBCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTIWX has more cash in the bank: 6.32B vs. RBBCX (836M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than FTIWX: RBBCX (3.17) vs FTIWX (2.99). FTIWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTIWX (20 years) vs RBBCX (20 years). RBBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTIWX (0.53). FTIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBCX (12.00). FTIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTIWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTIWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTIWX (500). FTIWX (10.58) and RBBCX (10.50) have marching annual gain over last year. FTIWX return over 5 years is better than : 16.00 vs. RBBCX (8.75).
| FTIWX | RBBCX | FTIWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.71 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.71 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.410 | 4.172 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 836M | 756% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 3.17 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.58 | 10.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.44 | 27.24 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.00 | 8.75 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.81 | 46.07 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement