Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison
Open Charts FTIWX vs RBBCX
FTIWX vs RBBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTIWX vs. RBBCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTIWX is a StrongBuy and RBBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTIWX has more cash in the bank: 6.31B vs. RBBCX (811M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than FTIWX: RBBCX (3.17) vs FTIWX (3.00). FTIWX was incepted earlier than RBBCX: FTIWX (20 years) vs RBBCX (21 years). RBBCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FTIWX (0.53). FTIWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RBBCX (12.00). FTIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: FTIWX (0) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTIWX: RBBCX (1000) vs FTIWX (500). FTIWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. RBBCX (4.75). FTIWX return over 5 years is better than : 13.92 vs. RBBCX (8.74).
| FTIWX | RBBCX | FTIWX / RBBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 1.71 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.71 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.971 | 3.335 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 6.31B | 811M | 778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.17 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | 4.75 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.32 | 26.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.92 | 8.74 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.68 | 40.98 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers