Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMKX vs RNWEX
FTMKX vs RNWEX Comparison
Open Charts FTMKX vs RNWEX
FTMKX vs RNWEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMKX vs. RNWEX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMKX is a Buy and RNWEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWEX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FTMKX (13.1B). RNWEX pays higher dividends than FTMKX: RNWEX (0.99) vs FTMKX (0.86). FTMKX was incepted earlier than RNWEX: FTMKX (22 years) vs RNWEX (24 years). FTMKX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWEX (0.92). FTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWEX (46.00). FTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWEX: FTMKX (0) vs RNWEX (250). FTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.52 vs. RNWEX (20.43). FTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 51.93 vs. RNWEX (17.66).
| FTMKX | RNWEX | FTMKX / RNWEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.92 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.92 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.224 | 16.144 | 150% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 88.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.99 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.52 | 20.43 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.76 | 52.77 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.93 | 17.66 | 294% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.81 | 105.86 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement