Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMKX vs RNWFX
FTMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FTMKX vs RNWFX
FTMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMKX is a Hold and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. FTMKX (13.6B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FTMKX: RNWFX (1.20) vs FTMKX (0.83). FTMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FTMKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FTMKX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FTMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.40 vs. RNWFX (17.39). FTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 49.83 vs. RNWFX (18.43).
| FTMKX | RNWFX | FTMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.487 | 16.517 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 90B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.20 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.40 | 17.39 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.97 | 54.50 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.83 | 18.43 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.92 | 114.22 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement