Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMKX vs RNWFX
FTMKX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts FTMKX vs RNWFX
FTMKX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMKX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMKX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.6B vs. FTMKX (13.1B). RNWFX pays higher dividends than FTMKX: RNWFX (1.22) vs FTMKX (0.86). FTMKX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: FTMKX (22 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). FTMKX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). FTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). FTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWFX: FTMKX (0) vs RNWFX (250). FTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.52 vs. RNWFX (20.85). FTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 51.93 vs. RNWFX (19.24).
| FTMKX | RNWFX | FTMKX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.62 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.224 | 16.357 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 88.6B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.22 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.52 | 20.85 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.76 | 54.29 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.93 | 19.24 | 270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.81 | 109.24 | 129% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement