Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTMKX vs RNWHX
FTMKX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FTMKX vs RNWHX
FTMKX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTMKX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTMKX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FTMKX (13.9B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FTMKX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FTMKX (0.81). FTMKX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FTMKX (22 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FTMKX (1.42) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FTMKX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.96 vs. RNWHX (15.58). FTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 44.85 vs. RNWHX (12.84).
| FTMKX | RNWHX | FTMKX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 0.72 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.742 | 10.921 | 199% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.9B | 90.7B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.14 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.96 | 15.58 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 83.64 | 40.80 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.85 | 12.84 | 349% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.10 | 103.12 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement