Advertisement
FTNT vs RDWR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTNT is a Hold and RDWR is a Hold.
| FTNT | RDWR | FTNT / RDWR | |
| Capitalization | 125B | 1.23B | 10,196% |
| EBITDA | 2.8B | 21M | 13,333% |
| Gain YTD | 113.877 | 20.922 | 544% |
| P/E Ratio | 60.01 | 74.69 | 80% |
| Revenue | 7.53B | 318M | 2,367% |
| Total Cash | 4.07B | 248M | 1,641% |
| Total Debt | 497M | 16.1M | 3,087% |
FTNT | RDWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 57 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTNT's Valuation (92) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as RDWR (93). This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDWR (100). This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDWR (82). This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (44). This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RDWR (57). This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
| FTNT | RDWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% | 6 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 63% | 13 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 71% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTNT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green while RDWR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FTNT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- RDWR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTNT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RDWR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTNT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RDWR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FTNT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.82% price change this week, while RDWR (@Computer Communications) price change was +4.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +6.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
RDWR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+6.70% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GLVYX | 90.50 | 0.64 | +0.71% |
| Invesco Global Focus Y | |||
| TEEFX | 94.37 | 0.57 | +0.61% |
| T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity I | |||
| PDIAX | 23.69 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| Virtus KAR Equity Income A | |||
| ATHDX | 26.07 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| American Century Heritage R6 | |||
| VIVIX | 86.33 | -0.19 | -0.22% |
| Vanguard MStar Value Indx Institutional | |||
FTNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 75% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 70% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| OKTA - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
More | ||||
RDWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDWR has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDWR jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDWR | 100% | -4.65% | ||
| NET - RDWR | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| CRWD - RDWR | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| NTCT - RDWR | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| PANW - RDWR | 51% Loosely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| OKTA - RDWR | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.03% | ||
More | ||||