Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTQGX vs RGACX
FTQGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTQGX vs RGACX
FTQGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTQGX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTQGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FTQGX (5.42B). FTQGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FTQGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTQGX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTQGX (0.69). FTQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FTQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTQGX (0) vs RGACX (250). FTQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.49 vs. RGACX (6.33). FTQGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. RGACX (13.29).
| FTQGX | RGACX | FTQGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.931 | 6.417 | 435% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.49 | 6.33 | 497% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.50 | 43.37 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 13.29 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 181.77 | 108.42 | 168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement