Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTQGX vs RGACX
FTQGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FTQGX vs RGACX
FTQGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTQGX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTQGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FTQGX (5.01B). FTQGX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FTQGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FTQGX (30 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FTQGX (0.69). FTQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). FTQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FTQGX (0) vs RGACX (250). FTQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.78 vs. RGACX (-0.53). FTQGX return over 5 years is better than : 22.26 vs. RGACX (10.82).
| FTQGX | RGACX | FTQGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.93 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.525 | 8.819 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.01B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.78 | -0.53 | -1,652% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.52 | 40.68 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.26 | 10.82 | 206% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.18 | 101.31 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement