Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTQGX vs RGAGX
FTQGX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTQGX vs RGAGX
FTQGX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTQGX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTQGX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FTQGX (5.42B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTQGX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FTQGX (0.00). FTQGX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTQGX (30 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FTQGX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FTQGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 153.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FTQGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTQGX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FTQGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.49 vs. RGAGX (7.43). FTQGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.31 vs. RGAGX (17.57).
| FTQGX | RGAGX | FTQGX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.29 | 238% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.29 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.931 | 6.764 | 413% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.42B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.49 | 7.43 | 424% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.50 | 47.41 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.31 | 17.57 | 229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 181.77 | 117.77 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement