Ad is loading...
FTRNX vs GFACX
FTRNX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
FTRNX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FTRNX (3.4B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFACX: FTRNX (0.66) vs GFACX (0.00). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FTRNX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. FTRNX (-16.48). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.97 vs. GFACX (37.34).
| FTRNX | GFACX | FTRNX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.36 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.36 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.767 | -9.959 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.48 | -7.10 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.78 | 2.19 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.97 | 37.34 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 35.37 | 185% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...