Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFACX
FTRNX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFACX
FTRNX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FTRNX (5.02B). FTRNX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FTRNX (68 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.74). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: FTRNX (0) vs GFACX (250). FTRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.15 vs. GFACX (3.51). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.15 vs. GFACX (7.69).
| FTRNX | GFACX | FTRNX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 68 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.797 | 8.618 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 3.51 | 460% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.91 | 38.24 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.15 | 7.69 | 470% |
| Returns for 10 years | 164.49 | 85.20 | 193% |