Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.41
Change+$0.66 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FTRNX (4.55B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.51) vs GFAFX (0.29). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.72 vs. FTRNX (7.61). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.77 vs. GFAFX (42.28).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.085 | 19.862 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.29 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 14.72 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.23 | 76.01 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.77 | 42.28 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.05 | 105.23 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers