Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. FTRNX (4.7B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.49) vs GFAFX (0.28). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. FTRNX (-4.24). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.21 vs. GFAFX (34.10).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.393 | 15.767 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.28 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.24 | 6.88 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.73 | 62.71 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.21 | 34.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.24 | 89.41 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement