Ad is loading...
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.54
Change+$1.04 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FTRNX (3.4B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.66) vs GFAFX (0.35). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.32 vs. FTRNX (-16.48). GFAFX (47.17) and FTRNX (46.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.767 | -9.789 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.4B | 261B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.35 | 187% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.48 | -5.32 | 310% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.78 | 6.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.97 | 47.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.59 | 50.37 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...