Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$79.50
Change-$0.03 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.92B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. FTRNX (3.83B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.59) vs GFAFX (0.32). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. FTRNX (-0.04). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 57.91 vs. GFAFX (51.74).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.780 | 7.782 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.83B | 314B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.32 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.04 | 8.97 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.62 | 49.73 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.91 | 51.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.23 | 77.16 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement