Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.24
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FTRNX (4.29B). FTRNX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FTRNX (0.53) vs GFAFX (0.30). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (67 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FTRNX (0.59). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.76 vs. FTRNX (10.06). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.11 vs. GFAFX (37.88).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.67 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.778 | 15.564 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.30 | 178% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 15.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.18 | 54.65 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.11 | 37.88 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.75 | 99.66 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement