Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs GFAFX
FTRNX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FTRNX (5.02B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: GFAFX (0.20) vs FTRNX (0.00). FTRNX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FTRNX (68 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). FTRNX (0.74) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FTRNX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FTRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. GFAFX (-0.57). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 28.43 vs. GFAFX (10.50).
| FTRNX | GFAFX | FTRNX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 68 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.489 | 3.768 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.02B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | -0.57 | -1,674% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.05 | 34.34 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 10.50 | 271% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.66 | 95.91 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement