Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.35
Change+$0.53 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. FTRNX (4.29B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: RGAGX (0.60) vs FTRNX (0.53). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.26 vs. FTRNX (10.06). FTRNX (41.11) and RGAGX (39.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTRNX | RGAGX | FTRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.778 | 15.828 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.60 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.06 | 16.26 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.18 | 55.92 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.11 | 39.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.75 | 102.72 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers