Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$89.59
Change+$0.67 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. FTRNX (4.55B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: RGAGX (0.58) vs FTRNX (0.51). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTRNX (67 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FTRNX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.21 vs. FTRNX (7.61). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.77 vs. RGAGX (44.18).
| FTRNX | RGAGX | FTRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.30 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 67 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.085 | 20.174 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.55B | 341B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.58 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.61 | 15.21 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.23 | 77.47 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.77 | 44.18 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 147.05 | 108.40 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers