Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FTRNX vs RGAGX
FTRNX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTRNX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTRNX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. FTRNX (4.62B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than FTRNX: RGAGX (0.51) vs FTRNX (0.00). FTRNX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FTRNX (68 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). FTRNX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). FTRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RGAGX (32.00). FTRNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FTRNX (0) vs RGAGX (250). FTRNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.76 vs. RGAGX (1.70). FTRNX return over 5 years is better than : 26.74 vs. RGAGX (15.48).
| FTRNX | RGAGX | FTRNX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.29 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 68 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.884 | 9.780 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.62B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.76 | 1.70 | 398% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.02 | 44.33 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.74 | 15.48 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.24 | 107.94 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers