FTS
Price
$50.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.38B
31 days until earnings call
HRNNF
Price
$35.40
Change
+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
21.48B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTS vs HRNNF

Header iconFTS vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts FTS vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
Fortis
Price$50.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$711.85K
Capitalization25.38B
Hydro One
Price$35.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
Volume$3.56K
Capitalization21.48B
FTS vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTS vs. HRNNF commentary
Oct 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTS is a StrongBuy and HRNNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FTS: $50.28 vs. HRNNF: $35.85)
Brand notoriety: FTS and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTS: 109% vs. HRNNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- FTS: $25.38B vs. HRNNF: $21.48B
FTS [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $25.38B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $161B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FTS is a better buy in the short-term than HRNNF.

Price Growth

FTS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.70% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($25.4B) has a higher market cap than HRNNF($21.5B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than FTS: HRNNF (23.59) vs FTS (20.59). FTS YTD gains are higher at: 20.953 vs. HRNNF (15.804). FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.78B vs. HRNNF (3.05B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. HRNNF (71M). HRNNF has less debt than FTS: HRNNF (18.1B) vs FTS (33.8B). FTS has higher revenues than HRNNF: FTS (11.9B) vs HRNNF (8.76B).
FTSHRNNFFTS / HRNNF
Capitalization25.4B21.5B118%
EBITDA5.78B3.05B190%
Gain YTD20.95315.804133%
P/E Ratio20.5923.5987%
Revenue11.9B8.76B136%
Total Cash221M71M311%
Total Debt33.8B18.1B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTS vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
FTS
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1073
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5915
SMR RATING
1..100
7769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5259
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3850
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (72). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (59). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (77). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (59). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (50). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTSHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STMZF15.600.10
+0.65%
Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust PLC
FLTR25.490.02
+0.08%
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
XHYE38.90N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sctr ETF
DFEB46.57-0.01
-0.03%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Feb
SPUC50.51-0.07
-0.14%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Upsd Cnvxty ETF

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
N/A
FTS - HRNNF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
NEE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
NWE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
EVRG - HRNNF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
EIX - HRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
More