FTS
Price
$51.40
Change
-$0.26 (-0.50%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
25.91B
10 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HRNNF
Price
$37.57
Change
-$0.36 (-0.95%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.54B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTS vs HRNNF

Header iconFTS vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts FTS vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
Fortis
Price$51.40
Change-$0.26 (-0.50%)
Volume$373.89K
Capitalization25.91B
Hydro One
Price$37.57
Change-$0.36 (-0.95%)
Volume$25.28K
Capitalization22.54B
FTS vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FTS vs. HRNNF commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTS is a Hold and HRNNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FTS: $51.40 vs. HRNNF: $37.57)
Brand notoriety: FTS and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FTS: 63% vs. HRNNF: 39%
Market capitalization -- FTS: $25.91B vs. HRNNF: $22.54B
FTS [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $25.91B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $22.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $173.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $23.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the long-term than FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FTS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FTS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the short-term than FTS.

Price Growth

FTS (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.31% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTS($25.9B) has a higher market cap than HRNNF($22.5B). HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than FTS: HRNNF (25.15) vs FTS (21.15). FTS (23.647) and HRNNF (22.902) have similar YTD gains . FTS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.78B vs. HRNNF (3.05B). FTS has more cash in the bank: 221M vs. HRNNF (71M). HRNNF has less debt than FTS: HRNNF (18.1B) vs FTS (33.8B). FTS has higher revenues than HRNNF: FTS (11.9B) vs HRNNF (8.76B).
FTSHRNNFFTS / HRNNF
Capitalization25.9B22.5B115%
EBITDA5.78B3.05B190%
Gain YTD23.64722.902103%
P/E Ratio21.1525.1584%
Revenue11.9B8.76B136%
Total Cash221M71M311%
Total Debt33.8B18.1B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FTS vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
FTS
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5912
SMR RATING
1..100
7769
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3442
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FTS's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (50). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (59). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (77). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FTS (50). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HRNNF (42). This means that FTS’s stock grew similarly to HRNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTSHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNBS29.350.43
+1.49%
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
AMZP28.690.29
+1.03%
Kurv Yield Premium Str Amazon ETF
MDIV15.810.03
+0.19%
Multi-Asset Diversified Income ETF
VNLA49.290.02
+0.04%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
OPTZ35.39N/A
N/A
Optimize Strategy Index ETF

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been loosely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
-0.50%
DUK - FTS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
SO - FTS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
ED - FTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
WEC - FTS
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
BKH - FTS
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
-0.95%
FTS - HRNNF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
NEE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
NWE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
EVRG - HRNNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
EIX - HRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More