Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTSDX vs TMAAX
FTSDX vs TMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FTSDX vs TMAAX
FTSDX vs TMAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTSDX vs. TMAAX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTSDX is a Hold and TMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTSDX (5.76B) and TMAAX (5.76B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FTSDX pays higher dividends than TMAAX: FTSDX (1.72) vs TMAAX (1.10). FTSDX was incepted earlier than TMAAX: FTSDX (23 years) vs TMAAX (21 years). TMAAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FTSDX (1.17). TMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FTSDX (41.00). TMAAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTSDX (4%) vs FTSDX (4%). FTSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAAX: FTSDX (0) vs TMAAX (2000). FTSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.74 vs. TMAAX (6.66). FTSDX return over 5 years is better than : 18.64 vs. TMAAX (17.01).
| FTSDX | TMAAX | FTSDX / TMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.13 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 1.36 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.401 | 9.464 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 78% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.76B | 5.76B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.72 | 1.10 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 6.66 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.76 | 35.30 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.64 | 17.01 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.07 | 69.99 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement