Ad is loading...
FTTNX vs HBLAX
FTTNX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$11.62
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
FTTNX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FTTNX (1.95B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FTTNX (2.49). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FTTNX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FTTNX (1.04) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FTTNX (22.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTTNX (4%) vs FTTNX (4%). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTTNX: HBLAX (2000) vs FTTNX (500). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.04 vs. HBLAX (4.48). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.62 vs. HBLAX (15.19).
| FTTNX | HBLAX | FTTNX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.89 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.956 | 0.100 | -957% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 11.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.49 | 3.37 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 4.48 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.23 | 3.18 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.62 | 15.19 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.45 | 29.63 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...