Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLAX
FTTNX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLAX
FTTNX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FTTNX (2.21B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLAX (3.13) vs FTTNX (2.24). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FTTNX (19 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). FTTNX (1.05) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTTNX (24.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTTNX (4%) vs FTTNX (4%). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTTNX: HBLAX (2000) vs FTTNX (500). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. HBLAX (1.89). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. HBLAX (5.00).
| FTTNX | HBLAX | FTTNX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.89 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.89 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.189 | 4.076 | 127% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 10.8B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 3.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 1.89 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 19.93 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.93 | 5.00 | 299% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.52 | 38.50 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement