Ad is loading...
FTTNX vs HBLCX
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLCX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 30% M
Price$12.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
Price$14.18
Change-$0.55 (-3.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLCX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 12.3B vs. FTTNX (2.02B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLCX (2.65) vs FTTNX (2.26). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTTNX (17 years) vs HBLCX (18 years). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FTTNX (22.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTTNX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTTNX (500). FTTNX (8.19) and HBLCX (8.03) have marching annual gain over last year. FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 13.71 vs. HBLCX (10.02).
| FTTNX | HBLCX | FTTNX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.198 | 6.933 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 12.3B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.26 | 2.65 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.19 | 8.03 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.33 | 1.39 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.71 | 10.02 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.71 | 29.33 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers