Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLCX
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLCX
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a Hold and HBLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. FTTNX (2.21B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLCX (2.43) vs FTTNX (2.24). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTTNX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FTTNX (1.05). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTTNX (24.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTTNX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTTNX (500). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.15 vs. HBLCX (0.97). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 14.93 vs. HBLCX (0.70).
| FTTNX | HBLCX | FTTNX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.65 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.189 | 3.524 | 147% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 10.8B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.43 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.15 | 0.97 | 738% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.81 | 16.99 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.93 | 0.70 | 2,119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.52 | 28.85 | 161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement