Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTTNX vs HBLCX
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison
Open Charts FTTNX vs HBLCX
FTTNX vs HBLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTTNX vs. HBLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTTNX is a StrongBuy and HBLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLCX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. FTTNX (2.26B). HBLCX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: HBLCX (2.47) vs FTTNX (2.24). FTTNX was incepted earlier than HBLCX: FTTNX (19 years) vs HBLCX (20 years). HBLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than FTTNX (1.05). HBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. FTTNX (24.00). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLCX: FTTNX (0) vs HBLCX (2000). HBLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FTTNX: HBLCX (2000) vs FTTNX (500). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.41 vs. HBLCX (4.05). FTTNX return over 5 years is better than : 16.28 vs. HBLCX (1.87).
| FTTNX | HBLCX | FTTNX / HBLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.65 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.65 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.507 | 3.951 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 11.1B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.24 | 2.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.41 | 4.05 | 281% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 15.85 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.28 | 1.87 | 872% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.54 | 28.44 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement