FTWO
Price
$44.33
Change
-$0.86 (-1.90%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
75.15M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$96.59
Change
-$4.70 (-4.64%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Net Assets
3.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTWO vs XME

FTWO vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • FTWO provides thematic exposure to national and natural resource security across fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear energy, and gold and precious metals sectors, while XME focuses narrowly on U.S. metals and mining companies.
  • FTWO holds approximately 51 securities with a market-cap weighted approach and an expense ratio of 0.49 percent, whereas XME maintains a modified equal-weighted portfolio of roughly 36 to 39 holdings and charges a lower expense ratio of 0.35 percent.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and target natural resources, yet FTWO incorporates broader geopolitical and security themes including defense and nuclear, creating differentiated risk and return drivers compared with XME’s pure-play metals exposure.
  • FTWO emphasizes U.S. and Canadian issuers, while XME is exclusively U.S.-focused, resulting in distinct geographic and liquidity profiles within the broader materials and energy complex.
  • Expense efficiency favors XME, but FTWO’s diversified thematic basket may appeal to investors seeking multi-sector exposure to resource security trends.
  • Relative positioning depends on commodity price cycles, defense spending, and energy transition dynamics rather than short-term price fluctuations.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to natural resources and related security themes often evaluate specialized equity ETFs that differ in scope and construction. The Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and the State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) both provide access to resource-intensive sectors, yet they pursue distinct strategies. FTWO targets companies tied to national and natural resource security across multiple sub-sectors, while XME concentrates on metals and mining. This comparison highlights structural differences, cost structures, and thematic positioning to assist investors evaluating complementary or alternative allocations within the same broad investment universe.

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) Overview

FTWO seeks to track the Bloomberg Natural Resources & Security Index, providing exposure to U.S. and Canadian companies engaged in national security and natural resource security. The fund maintains approximately 51 holdings and applies a market-capitalization weighting methodology within a tiered sector framework. Its five primary sectors include fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear energy, and gold and precious metals. Top holdings typically feature companies such as Deere & Co., Constellation Energy, Exxon Mobil, GE Aerospace, and Chevron. The ETF carries an expense ratio of 0.49 percent and follows a passive, index-replication strategy with quarterly rebalancing. FTWO is structured as an open-ended fund and emphasizes corporate governance engagement alongside index tracking.

State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

XME seeks to track the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, delivering exposure to U.S. companies involved in metals and mining activities. The fund holds roughly 36 to 39 securities using a modified equal-weighted methodology that balances exposure across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization names. Its focus remains on sub-industries such as aluminum, coal, copper, gold, silver, and steel. The ETF maintains an expense ratio of 0.35 percent and employs a sampling strategy within a passive structure. XME is designed for investors seeking targeted metals and mining sector participation and rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the natural resources sector, influenced by commodity price cycles, geopolitical developments, and energy transition policies. Capital flows into metals and mining respond to infrastructure spending and electrification demand, while broader security themes encompass defense budgets and critical mineral supply chains. Regulatory changes affecting mining permits and nuclear energy policy, along with macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and inflation, shape sector performance. Risks include commodity volatility, regulatory hurdles, and shifts in global trade dynamics that affect both U.S.-centric and cross-border resource exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FTWO’s multi-sector approach has linked performance to defense spending trends, agricultural commodity movements, and nuclear energy developments, resulting in potentially lower correlation to pure metals prices. XME’s modified equal-weighted construction has historically amplified participation in metals price rallies while also increasing sensitivity to mining-specific earnings cycles. Relative positioning reflects differences in volatility profiles, with FTWO offering broader thematic diversification and XME providing concentrated metals exposure. Sector rotation driven by macroeconomic shifts and commodity trends continues to influence both funds’ behavior over medium-term horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like FTWO and XME can leverage this platform for efficient market analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader thematic diversification, number of holdings, and sector momentum alignment, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to FTWO for investors targeting multi-faceted resource security exposure, while recognizing XME’s cost efficiency and concentrated metals focus as attractive for narrower mandates. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTWO vs. XME commentary
Oct 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWO is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FTWO with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

FTWO in +1.04% Uptrend, growing for three consecutive days on October 16, 2026

Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where FTWO advanced for three days, in 200 of 221 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FTWO's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 7 of 12 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

FTWO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FTWO as a result. In 40 of 48 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FTWO turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 24 of the 32 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 75%.

FTWO moved below its 50-day moving average on September 24, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for FTWO crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FTWO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.

The Aroon Indicator for FTWO entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XME with price predictions
Oct 22, 2026

XME in downward trend: 10-day moving average moved below 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026

The 10-day moving average for XME crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for XME turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 38 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

XME moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XME declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for XME entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for XME's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

Following a +2.36% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XME advanced for three days, in 337 of 363 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTWOXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
FTWO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTWO
1D Price
Change %
FTWO100%
-1.91%
WPM - FTWO
75%
Closely correlated
-6.54%
NEM - FTWO
75%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
AEM - FTWO
75%
Closely correlated
-5.98%
FNV - FTWO
73%
Closely correlated
-4.74%
BWXT - FTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
-5.78%
More

XME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XME has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XME jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XME
1D Price
Change %
XME100%
-4.64%
CDE - XME
77%
Closely correlated
-8.26%
MP - XME
73%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
NEM - XME
72%
Closely correlated
-2.62%
DC - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-5.53%
CTGO - XME
70%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FND48.173.06
+6.78%
Floor & Decor Holdings
ASLE4.700.13
+2.84%
AerSale Corp
CCNE35.240.70
+2.03%
CNB Financial Corp
VEEV322.552.00
+0.62%
Veeva Systems
AWRE0.87-0.03
-3.29%
Aware