FTWO
Price
$44.82Alerts
Change
-$0.39 (-0.86%)
Updated
Nov 12, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
75.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XME
Price
$95.25Alerts
Change
-$1.98 (-2.04%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Net Assets
3.6B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTWO vs XME

FTWO vs XME Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME)

Key Takeaways

  • FTWO provides thematic exposure to national and natural resource security across fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear energy, and gold and precious metals sectors, while XME focuses narrowly on U.S. metals and mining companies.
  • FTWO holds approximately 51 securities with a market-cap weighted approach and an expense ratio of 0.49 percent, whereas XME maintains a modified equal-weighted portfolio of roughly 36 to 39 holdings and charges a lower expense ratio of 0.35 percent.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and target natural resources, yet FTWO incorporates broader geopolitical and security themes including defense and nuclear, creating differentiated risk and return drivers compared with XME’s pure-play metals exposure.
  • FTWO emphasizes U.S. and Canadian issuers, while XME is exclusively U.S.-focused, resulting in distinct geographic and liquidity profiles within the broader materials and energy complex.
  • Expense efficiency favors XME, but FTWO’s diversified thematic basket may appeal to investors seeking multi-sector exposure to resource security trends.
  • Relative positioning depends on commodity price cycles, defense spending, and energy transition dynamics rather than short-term price fluctuations.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to natural resources and related security themes often evaluate specialized equity ETFs that differ in scope and construction. The Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and the State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) both provide access to resource-intensive sectors, yet they pursue distinct strategies. FTWO targets companies tied to national and natural resource security across multiple sub-sectors, while XME concentrates on metals and mining. This comparison highlights structural differences, cost structures, and thematic positioning to assist investors evaluating complementary or alternative allocations within the same broad investment universe.

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) Overview

FTWO seeks to track the Bloomberg Natural Resources & Security Index, providing exposure to U.S. and Canadian companies engaged in national security and natural resource security. The fund maintains approximately 51 holdings and applies a market-capitalization weighting methodology within a tiered sector framework. Its five primary sectors include fuel, aerospace and defense, agriculture, nuclear energy, and gold and precious metals. Top holdings typically feature companies such as Deere & Co., Constellation Energy, Exxon Mobil, GE Aerospace, and Chevron. The ETF carries an expense ratio of 0.49 percent and follows a passive, index-replication strategy with quarterly rebalancing. FTWO is structured as an open-ended fund and emphasizes corporate governance engagement alongside index tracking.

State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) Overview

XME seeks to track the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, delivering exposure to U.S. companies involved in metals and mining activities. The fund holds roughly 36 to 39 securities using a modified equal-weighted methodology that balances exposure across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization names. Its focus remains on sub-industries such as aluminum, coal, copper, gold, silver, and steel. The ETF maintains an expense ratio of 0.35 percent and employs a sampling strategy within a passive structure. XME is designed for investors seeking targeted metals and mining sector participation and rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the natural resources sector, influenced by commodity price cycles, geopolitical developments, and energy transition policies. Capital flows into metals and mining respond to infrastructure spending and electrification demand, while broader security themes encompass defense budgets and critical mineral supply chains. Regulatory changes affecting mining permits and nuclear energy policy, along with macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and inflation, shape sector performance. Risks include commodity volatility, regulatory hurdles, and shifts in global trade dynamics that affect both U.S.-centric and cross-border resource exposure.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, FTWO’s multi-sector approach has linked performance to defense spending trends, agricultural commodity movements, and nuclear energy developments, resulting in potentially lower correlation to pure metals prices. XME’s modified equal-weighted construction has historically amplified participation in metals price rallies while also increasing sensitivity to mining-specific earnings cycles. Relative positioning reflects differences in volatility profiles, with FTWO offering broader thematic diversification and XME providing concentrated metals exposure. Sector rotation driven by macroeconomic shifts and commodity trends continues to influence both funds’ behavior over medium-term horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like FTWO and XME can leverage this platform for efficient market analysis.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors including broader thematic diversification, number of holdings, and sector momentum alignment, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to FTWO for investors targeting multi-faceted resource security exposure, while recognizing XME’s cost efficiency and concentrated metals focus as attractive for narrower mandates. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FTWO vs. XME commentary
Nov 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWO is a Hold and XME is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FTWO with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

Momentum Indicator for FTWO turns negative, indicating new downward trend

FTWO saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on November 12, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 40 of the 48 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 83%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FTWO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.

The Aroon Indicator for FTWO entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FTWO's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 11 of 13 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FTWO just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where FTWO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 31 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Following a +5.15% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FTWO advanced for three days, in 202 of 224 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

FTWO may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for XME with price predictions
Nov 12, 2026

XME's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for XME moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 29 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 52 cases where XME's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for XME just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where XME's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 43 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

Following a +9.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where XME advanced for three days, in 333 of 361 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

XME may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on XME as a result. In 55 of 69 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where XME declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for XME entered a downward trend on November 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FTWOXME
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

FTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTWO has been loosely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTWO jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTWO
1D Price
Change %
FTWO100%
-0.97%
SMR - FTWO
57%
Loosely correlated
-7.84%
CNH - FTWO
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
HEI - FTWO
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.82%
AA - FTWO
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.44%
ABX - FTWO
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMPL12.650.01
+0.08%
Simply Good Foods Company (The)
TFC49.89-0.37
-0.74%
Truist Financial Corp
ERAS15.78-1.02
-6.07%
Erasca
EDSA2.08-0.14
-6.31%
Edesa Biotech
RNAC6.36-0.53
-7.63%
Cartesian Therapeutics