Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTWRX vs RWIBX
FTWRX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts FTWRX vs RWIBX
FTWRX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTWRX vs. RWIBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWRX is a Buy and RWIBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FTWRX (2.9B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: RWIBX (0.70) vs FTWRX (0.00). FTWRX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: FTWRX (13 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FTWRX (0.78). FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: RWIBX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.55 vs. FTWRX (-1.48). RWIBX (28.63) and FTWRX (27.41) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FTWRX | RWIBX | FTWRX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.51 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.839 | 15.403 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 158B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.48 | 10.55 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.31 | 48.09 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.41 | 28.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.05 | 90.07 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers