Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTWRX vs RWIBX
FTWRX vs RWIBX Comparison
Open Charts FTWRX vs RWIBX
FTWRX vs RWIBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FTWRX vs. RWIBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTWRX is a StrongBuy and RWIBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWIBX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FTWRX (2.9B). RWIBX pays higher dividends than FTWRX: RWIBX (0.71) vs FTWRX (0.00). FTWRX was incepted earlier than RWIBX: FTWRX (13 years) vs RWIBX (24 years). RWIBX (1.51) is less costly to investors than FTWRX (0.78). FTWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.16 vs. RWIBX (44.00). RWIBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTWRX: RWIBX (250) vs FTWRX (1000000). RWIBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 vs. FTWRX (2.81). RWIBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.74 vs. FTWRX (30.38).
| FTWRX | RWIBX | FTWRX / RWIBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.51 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.51 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.748 | 16.460 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 156B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.81 | 16.18 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.70 | 51.06 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | 32.74 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.25 | 87.54 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement