Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZAX vs VIMSX
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZAX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq A
Price$51.48
Change-$0.99 (-1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.71M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$74.01
Change-$0.86 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.28B
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FTZAX (224M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZAX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZAX (0.06). FTZAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZAX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FTZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZAX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZAX (13.34) and VIMSX (12.88) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FTZAX | VIMSX | FTZAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.17 | 929% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.430 | 3.945 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 224M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.34 | 12.88 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.18 | 40.72 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 71.54 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 116.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement