Ad is loading...
FTZAX vs VIMSX
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZAX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq A
Price$46.56
Change+$0.37 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.19M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$67.08
Change+$0.54 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.23B
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 175B vs. FTZAX (189M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZAX: VIMSX (1.46) vs FTZAX (0.06). FTZAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZAX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (13.00). FTZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZAX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). FTZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.95 vs. VIMSX (3.82).
| FTZAX | VIMSX | FTZAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.17 | 929% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.949 | -7.620 | 117% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 189M | 175B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.46 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.95 | 3.82 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.89 | 5.73 | 539% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 67.38 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.10 | - |