Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FTZAX vs VIMSX
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FTZAX vs VIMSX
FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq A
Price$54.88
Change+$0.67 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.16M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.10
Change+$0.60 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
FTZAX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. FTZAX (233M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than FTZAX: VIMSX (1.40) vs FTZAX (0.06). FTZAX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: FTZAX (4 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). FTZAX (1.58) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). FTZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). FTZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: FTZAX (1000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. FTZAX (14.15).
| FTZAX | VIMSX | FTZAX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.17 | 788% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.17 | 929% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.860 | 8.985 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 192B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 1.40 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.15 | 17.01 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.02 | 40.99 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 69.49 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 130.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement