Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FUAMX vs RGVBX
FUAMX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts FUAMX vs RGVBX
FUAMX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUAMX vs. RGVBX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUAMX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVBX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. FUAMX (8.19B). FUAMX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: FUAMX (3.76) vs RGVBX (3.30). FUAMX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: FUAMX (9 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FUAMX (0.03). RGVBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FUAMX (40.00). FUAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGVBX: FUAMX (0) vs RGVBX (250). FUAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.25 vs. RGVBX (2.45). FUAMX return over 5 years is better than : -1.71 vs. RGVBX (-3.72).
| FUAMX | RGVBX | FUAMX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.32 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.32 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.156 | -0.403 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.19B | 24.3B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 3.30 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.25 | 2.45 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.32 | 8.74 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.71 | -3.72 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers