FUJHF
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.77 (-3.71%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
14.76B
TM
Price
$198.70
Change
+$0.10 (+0.05%)
Updated
Aug 20, 11:31 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
258.83B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FUJHF vs TM

Header iconFUJHF vs TM Comparison
Open Charts FUJHF vs TMBanner chart's image
Subaru
Price$20.00
Change-$0.77 (-3.71%)
Volume$282
Capitalization14.76B
Toyota Motor
Price$198.70
Change+$0.10 (+0.05%)
Volume$600
Capitalization258.83B
FUJHF vs TM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FUJHF vs. TM commentary
Aug 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUJHF is a Hold and TM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FUJHF: $20.00 vs. TM: $198.60)
Brand notoriety: FUJHF and TM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUJHF: 40% vs. TM: 63%
Market capitalization -- FUJHF: $14.76B vs. TM: $258.83B
FUJHF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $14.76B. TM’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $258.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.06T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $35.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUJHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TM is a better buy in the long-term than FUJHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUJHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUJHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUJHF is a better buy in the short-term than TM.

Price Growth

FUJHF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while TM (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

TM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (-0.85% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TM($259B) has a higher market cap than FUJHF($14.8B). TM has higher P/E ratio than FUJHF: TM (9.00) vs FUJHF (6.43). FUJHF YTD gains are higher at: 17.647 vs. TM (2.050). TM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.1T vs. FUJHF (808B). TM has more cash in the bank: 15.97T vs. FUJHF (1.85T). FUJHF has less debt than TM: FUJHF (400B) vs TM (38.44T). TM has higher revenues than FUJHF: TM (48.45T) vs FUJHF (4.76T).
FUJHFTMFUJHF / TM
Capitalization14.8B259B6%
EBITDA808B8.1T10%
Gain YTD17.6472.050861%
P/E Ratio6.439.0071%
Revenue4.76T48.45T10%
Total Cash1.85T15.97T12%
Total Debt400B38.44T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUJHF vs TM: Fundamental Ratings
FUJHF
TM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10048
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUJHF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as TM (23) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

TM's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUJHF (100) in the null industry. This means that TM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

TM's SMR Rating (100) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as FUJHF (100) in the null industry. This means that TM’s stock grew similarly to FUJHF’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as TM (45) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

FUJHF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as TM (27) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that FUJHF’s stock grew similarly to TM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FUJHFTM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FUJHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REIT26.260.42
+1.63%
ALPS Active REIT ETF
FDM72.400.26
+0.36%
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
IBGK23.31N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2054 Term Trsy ETF
ACP5.97-0.01
-0.17%
abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund
DYNF56.60-0.36
-0.63%
iShares U.S. Equity Fac Rotation Act ETF

FUJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FUJHF and HMC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUJHF and HMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUJHF
1D Price
Change %
FUJHF100%
-3.73%
HMC - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
F - FUJHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
TM - FUJHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
GELYF - FUJHF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.44%
GWLLY - FUJHF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More