Advertisement
FUL vs IFF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) vs. International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FUL maintains positive profit margins at 4.62%, outperforming IFF's negative -3.32% trailing twelve months (TTM) margins.
- IFF has a significantly larger market capitalization of $18 billion compared to FUL's $3.3 billion, offering greater scale.
- Both stocks feature dividend yields above 1.5%, with IFF at 2.26% and FUL at 1.63%, supported by recent payout increases.
- FUL trades at a lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 12.52 versus IFF's 15.72, suggesting relative value.
- Year-to-date (YTD), IFF leads with +5.7% returns compared to FUL's +1.6%, though FUL shows stronger one-year gains of 13%.
- Both exhibit moderate volatility with betas near 1.0, balancing growth potential and stability in the specialty chemicals sector.
Introduction
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) operate in the specialty chemicals sector, with FUL focusing on adhesives and sealants for industrial applications and IFF specializing in flavors, fragrances, and ingredients for consumer products. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and positioning amid fluctuating commodity prices and supply chain dynamics. Traders seeking sector exposure and investors evaluating relative value in materials stocks will find insights into momentum, valuation, and risk factors relevant for portfolio decisions in the current environment.
FUL Overview and Recent Performance
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) is a global manufacturer of adhesives, sealants, and other chemical products used in industries like hygiene, construction, and packaging. In recent market activity, the stock has hovered around the $60 level, retreating from its 52-week high of $68.63 amid broader sector pressures. Key influences include mixed first-quarter 2026 results, where earnings per share (EPS) slightly exceeded expectations at $0.57 while revenue fell short, alongside a 4.3% quarterly dividend increase signaling management confidence. Earlier guidance raises for 2026 contributed to positive sentiment shifts, though shares recently dipped below the 200-day moving average, reflecting caution on revenue trends.
IFF Overview and Recent Performance
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF) develops and produces flavors, fragrances, and specialty ingredients for food, beverage, health, and personal care markets. Recently, shares have traded near $71, within a 52-week range of $59.14 to $84.45, supported by steady volume. Sentiment has been buoyed by a dividend declaration for Q2 2026 and preparations for Q1 earnings on May 5, following a Q4 revenue beat despite year-over-year declines. Innovations like pet probiotics highlight growth in wellness segments, though trailing losses temper enthusiasm, with the stock maintaining resilience above key support levels in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots selected from hundreds available, each designed for current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies like single-agent, multi-agent, and double-agent approaches, with timeframes from 15 minutes to several days and sectors including technology, semiconductors, industrials, and energy. Standout performers report annualized returns up to 163%, win rates of 55-75%, profit factors ranging 1.5-3.3, and favorable profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 2.5. Statistics such as average trade durations of 1-8 days and controlled drawdowns underscore their risk-adjusted appeal. Explore these curated bots to align with your trading style and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FUL and IFF both serve specialty chemicals but diverge in business models: FUL targets industrial adhesives with drivers in construction and packaging, while IFF emphasizes consumer-facing flavors and fragrances tied to food and wellness trends. Growth contrasts emerge with FUL's positive TTM net income versus IFF's losses, though IFF benefits from scale and higher free cash flow. Recent momentum favors IFF YTD, but FUL leads over one year. Risk profiles are similar with comparable betas, yet IFF's lower debt-to-equity (46.9% vs. 107.9%) adds stability. Market sentiment reflects IFF's earnings catalyst against FUL's valuation edge.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward FUL based on trend consistency in profitability, attractive forward valuation, and recent dividend reinforcement amid stable industrial demand. While IFF offers scale and a near-term catalyst, FUL's positive margins and relative pricing position it favorably for potential outperformance in the specialty chemicals space.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a Hold and IFF is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- IFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- IFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while IFF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -2.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2026.
IFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.31% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| FUL | IFF | FUL / IFF | |
| Capitalization | 3.44B | 19.1B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 541M | 1.97B | 28% |
| Gain YTD | 8.986 | 13.967 | 64% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.25 | 23.51 | 95% |
| Revenue | 3.46B | 10.8B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 108M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 6.44B | 32% |
FUL | IFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 28 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFF's Valuation (30) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as FUL (37) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IFF (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IFF’s over the last 12 months.
FUL's SMR Rating (77) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as IFF (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to IFF’s over the last 12 months.
IFF's Price Growth Rating (28) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as FUL (43) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
IFF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as FUL (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that IFF’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.
| FUL | IFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 9 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 59% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
Advertisement
FUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUL | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| AVNT - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| RPM - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| PPG - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| IOSP - FUL | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| OLN - FUL | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
IFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFF has been loosely correlated with PPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFF jumps, then PPG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFF | 100% | -1.00% | ||
| PPG - IFF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| AVNT - IFF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| AXTA - IFF | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| SHW - IFF | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| RPM - IFF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||