It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FULTP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FULTP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FULTP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.65% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FULTP | PQDI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago25% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago18% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago47% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 3 days ago53% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago45% | about 1 month ago44% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago30% | 4 days ago46% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago40% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FULTP has been loosely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FULTP jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FULTP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FULTP | 100% | +0.58% | ||
HBAN - FULTP | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
NSTS - FULTP | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HBANL - FULTP | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
FITB - FULTP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
PNC - FULTP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PQDI and FULTP have been poorly correlated (+-8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PQDI and FULTP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PQDI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PQDI | 100% | -0.05% | ||
FULTP - PQDI | -8% Poorly correlated | +0.58% |