Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FUMBX vs NECLX
FUMBX vs NECLX Comparison
Open Charts FUMBX vs NECLX
FUMBX vs NECLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUMBX vs. NECLX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUMBX is a Hold and NECLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUMBX has more cash in the bank: 3.61B vs. NECLX (643M). FUMBX pays higher dividends than NECLX: FUMBX (3.87) vs NECLX (2.71). FUMBX was incepted earlier than NECLX: FUMBX (9 years) vs NECLX (32 years). NECLX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FUMBX (0.03). NECLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. FUMBX (35.00). FUMBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NECLX: FUMBX (0) vs NECLX (2500). FUMBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.01 vs. NECLX (0.46). FUMBX return over 5 years is better than : 6.26 vs. NECLX (4.56).
| FUMBX | NECLX | FUMBX / NECLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.45 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.181 | -0.439 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.61B | 643M | 561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 2.71 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.01 | 0.46 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 10.15 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.26 | 4.56 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 8.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement