FUNC vs OCFC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNC is a Hold and OCFC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUNC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FUNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- OCFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FUNC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -10.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
OCFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| FUNC | OCFC | FUNC / OCFC | |
| Capitalization | 152M | 932M | 16% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 56.259 | 8.449 | 666% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.14 | 9.30 | 109% |
| Revenue | 71.3M | 399M | 18% |
| Total Cash | 86.9M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 112M | 974M | 11% |
FUNC | OCFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 23 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 25 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCFC's Valuation (23) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.
FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for OCFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew significantly faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
OCFC's SMR Rating (15) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.
FUNC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFC (50) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
| FUNC | OCFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 70% | 9 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 53% | 1 day ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 57% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PAADX | 17.95 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R5 | |||
| DRIOX | 9.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Driehaus International Small Cap Growth | |||
| NGCAX | 32.93 | -0.41 | -1.23% |
| Columbia Greater China A | |||
| PGLRX | 14.93 | -0.35 | -2.29% |
| Putnam Focused International Equity R | |||
| HLGEX | 50.14 | -2.23 | -4.26% |
| JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth I | |||
FUNC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUNC | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| EFSC - FUNC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| NWBI - FUNC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| SASR - FUNC | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| NBTB - FUNC | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| OCFC - FUNC | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.74% | ||
More | ||||