Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FUNCX vs RGABX
FUNCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FUNCX vs RGABX
FUNCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FUNCX (6.1B). FUNCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FUNCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FUNCX (21 years) vs RGABX (24 years). FUNCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FUNCX (26.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than FUNCX: RGABX (250) vs FUNCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.53 vs. FUNCX (-16.64). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 2.97 vs. FUNCX (-19.93).
| FUNCX | RGABX | FUNCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.38 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.38 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.712 | 3.336 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.1B | 357B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.64 | -2.53 | 657% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.33 | 27.90 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.93 | 2.97 | -671% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.79 | 77.23 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement