Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FUNCX vs RGABX
FUNCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts FUNCX vs RGABX
FUNCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNCX vs. RGABX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUNCX is a Hold and RGABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FUNCX (6.35B). FUNCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . FUNCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: FUNCX (21 years) vs RGABX (24 years). FUNCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.38). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FUNCX (26.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than FUNCX: RGABX (250) vs FUNCX (2500). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. FUNCX (-8.51). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 10.82 vs. FUNCX (-14.29).
| FUNCX | RGABX | FUNCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.38 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.38 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.623 | 8.319 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.35B | 361B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | 9.83 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.91 | 41.24 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.29 | 10.82 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.85 | 97.06 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement