FUSB moved below its 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 29 of 54 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FUSB as a result. In 60 of 127 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 47%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FUSB turned negative on November 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 22 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 44%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUSB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 49%.
FUSB broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 04, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
The 10-day moving average for FUSB crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +1.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUSB advanced for three days, in 117 of 221 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 30 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.878) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). P/E Ratio (12.326) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.370) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.017) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.313) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FUSB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly weaker than average sales and a marginally profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Aroon Indicator for PBHC entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 172 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 109 of the 172 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 63%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 42 of 76 cases where PBHC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PBHC as a result. In 72 of 126 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PBHC turned negative on November 10, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 27 of the 46 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 59%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PBHC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
PBHC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
PBHC moved above its 50-day moving average on November 11, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +1.32% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PBHC advanced for three days, in 93 of 191 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 49%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PBHC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 79 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. PBHC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 82 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 96 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.861) is normal, around the industry mean (1.262). PBHC's P/E Ratio (1724.000) is considerably higher than the industry average of (13.479). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.560) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.023) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. PBHC's P/S Ratio (1.729) is slightly lower than the industry average of (3.738).
FUSB | PBHC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 79 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUSB's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBHC (96) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew significantly faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.
FUSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBHC (79) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBHC’s over the last 12 months.
FUSB's SMR Rating (64) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PBHC (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FUSB’s stock grew similarly to PBHC’s over the last 12 months.
PBHC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FUSB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew similarly to FUSB’s over the last 12 months.
PBHC's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUSB (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PBHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUSB’s over the last 12 months.
| FUSB | PBHC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 53% | 22 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PBHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUSB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBHC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
FUSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.32% price change this week, while PBHC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.48%.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
A.I.dvisor tells us that FUSB and ECBK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FUSB and ECBK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUSB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUSB | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| ECBK - FUSB | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| BPOPM - FUSB | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
| FCNCA - FUSB | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| MNSBP - FUSB | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.62% | ||
| BMA - FUSB | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBHC and BOTJ have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBHC and BOTJ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBHC | 100% | +1.19% | ||
| BOTJ - PBHC | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| MBBC - PBHC | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.01% | ||
| BAFN - PBHC | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.57% | ||
| HNVR - PBHC | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| FUSB - PBHC | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFAW | 83.74 | 1.00 | +1.21% |
| Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) | |||
| ETHV | 30.36 | 0.34 | +1.13% |
| VanEck Ethereum ETF (ETHV) | |||
| QMID | 30.33 | 0.22 | +0.73% |
| WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) | |||
| JIII | 48.46 | 0.05 | +0.10% |
| Janus Henderson Income ETF | |||
| CCSB | 19.53 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| Carbon Collective Short Duration Green Bond ETF (CCSB) | |||