Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVDFX vs RMFEX
FVDFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FVDFX vs RMFEX
FVDFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVDFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVDFX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FVDFX (4.17B). FVDFX (1.43) and RMFEX (1.41) have matching dividends . FVDFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FVDFX (24 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FVDFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FVDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FVDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FVDFX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FVDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.49 vs. RMFEX (9.92). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.44 vs. FVDFX (30.34).
| FVDFX | RMFEX | FVDFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.62 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.62 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.974 | 11.123 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.41 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.49 | 9.92 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.34 | 40.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.34 | 39.44 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.15 | 101.32 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement