Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVDKX vs RMEBX
FVDKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FVDKX vs RMEBX
FVDKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVDKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVDKX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FVDKX (4.17B). FVDKX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FVDKX (1.48) vs RMEBX (0.99). FVDKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FVDKX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FVDKX (0.59). FVDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FVDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FVDKX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FVDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.50 vs. RMEBX (11.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.22 vs. FVDKX (31.36).
| FVDKX | RMEBX | FVDKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.07 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.07 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.866 | 11.623 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.17B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.99 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.50 | 11.28 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.34 | 37.51 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.36 | 38.22 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.56 | 93.03 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement