Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FVDKX vs RMEBX
FVDKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FVDKX vs RMEBX
FVDKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FVDKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVDKX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FVDKX (3.87B). FVDKX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FVDKX (1.58) vs RMEBX (1.04). FVDKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FVDKX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FVDKX (0.59). FVDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FVDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FVDKX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FVDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.48 vs. RMEBX (10.17). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. FVDKX (19.85).
| FVDKX | RMEBX | FVDKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.07 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.07 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.307 | 6.444 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 115B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.04 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.48 | 10.17 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.29 | 34.95 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.85 | 33.11 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.81 | 91.00 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement